Authoritarian Pseudo-Rationalism
Table of Contents Evidential Naïveté Masquerading as Rigor Bastardizing Objectivity Confusing "An Explanation" with "Best Explanation" The Nature of Neutrality Its not quite Pseudo-Intellectualism Generalizing the Concept Applying this to Risk Assessment Final Thoughts References I was rewatching clone wars, specifically s5 ep19; the episode where Ahsoka is accused of bombing the Jedi temple. While watching this sequence, something really struck me. When it’s informed to the Jedi council that Ahsoka allegedly killed clones and is on the run, some jedi masters respond with “I can’t believe she has fallen so far?”. Grand admiral Tarkin responds by saying “it’s not our place to operate on beliefs, we deal in facts and evidence and the evidence points to Ahsoka”. I find this fascinating because it reminds me of Schums “Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning”, and other scholars concerned with evidence...